How to stop giving rogue government CONSENT to violate your rights and turn you into a felon


MFP Commentary:
Police are NOT your friends. Take the advice in this article, and stay  out of jail.  This doubly applies if you are innocent, the last thing the police really care about is your guilt or innocence. Most of all they want a felony conviction regardless of whether you did anything criminal or not.
~MFP


How to stop giving rogue government CONSENT to violate your rights and turn you into a felon


MFP Commentary:

Another article that exposes the sheer insanity and criminality  of  the legislature, the courts, and the “police”.  Because as we know police are proud of being order followers.  The exact same excuse, for violating rights that the guards at Auschwitz Concentration camp tried to use as a defense when murdering Jews.

Let’s be perfectly clear. The war on drugs is a Satanic/United Nations agenda.  It is not authorized in the US Constitution.
Participating in the war on drugs is a crime and punishable under  USC title 18 sections 241 & 242  and also here.

 

Can anyone  explain to me how the psychopaths in the legislature, can take a God given right ,  and turn it into a permission?
(A right  that was respected until the early 20th century, when the globalists at the United Nations got their drug schedule  (1) into law of most 1st world countries.)
This is just a replay of the elite’s opium wars in China, which BTW made them rich and corrupted the Chinese Police.

What the state of MO has done  with it’s recent “legalization” would be similar to the legislature making it “legal” to have children or read the bible, ONLY when following their statutes that attenuate and trample that very right and turning them both into permissions. As you know (or I hope you know) a right, by definition, can not be legitimately changed, amended, or curtailed. So it is clear the the criminal/psychopaths in the MO legislature either do not know what a right is, or they flat out don’t care and sure as hell the  criminal “police”  care even less than the criminal legislature.

In closing I only have to say that I wish that people would use the brains that God gave them. Something I very rarely see.

~MFP


 

NJ State Police to launch Nazi-style door-to-door gun magazine confiscation campaign… at gunpoint, of course… NJ declares WAR on its own residents


MFP Commentary:
And when will Law abiding Americans finally decide that it is time to defend themselves from the criminal “order followers” calling themselves the police? When?…………

When Should You Shoot a Cop? by Lakin Rose


~MFP


 

(Natural News) A New Jersey law that makes it a felony to possess a gun magazine capable of holding over 10 rounds of ammunition is now active. This wildly unconstitutional law instantly criminalizes hundreds of thousands of New Jersey citizens who legally acquired normal capacity firearms magazines — which include 17-round pistol magazines and 30-round rifle magazines — as tools of self-defense against the very same violent criminals that are protected by the Democrats who passed the gun magazine ban.

Now, the New Jersey State Police have told Breitbart News they won’t rule out “house-to-house enforcement” of the new magazine ban, meaning they plan to conduct house-to-house arrests and gun magazine confiscations. These Nazi-style anti-gun operations will, of course, be carried out at gunpoint, further underscoring the entire purpose of the Second Amendment and the need for citizens to arm themselves with 30-round magazines to defend against government tyranny….Read More



MFP Commentary:

Another article that exposes the sheer insanity and criminality  of  the legislature, the courts, and the “police”.  Because as we know police are proud of being order followers.  The exact same excuse, for violating rights that the guards at Auschwitz Concentration camp tried to use as a defense when murdering Jews.

~MFP


 

Wave of “red flag laws” are coming that will deprive all Americans of their firearms because owning one is deemed “crazy” by left-wing bureaucrats

 

MFP EDITORIAL “Should we be arresting the gun grabbers?” / New Bill to Require Gov’t Review of Social Media Accounts, Search Engine History to Buy a Gun


MFP Commentary:
“Should we be arresting the gun grabbers?”

It pains me that I even have to ask this question, but it’s obvious that Americans are so dumbed down that they don’t have a clue as to the the correct  answer, or why.

Would you support the arrest of people  preaching  the idea  that we should hang blacks  and put Jews  into FEMA camps?  Or any other call for using violence, to violate the inalienable God given rights of anyone?
Well isn’t self defense a  God given right? One that is explicitly protected from government intrusion by the 2nd amendment. Right in the US Constitution, the highest law of the land.

Yet  most of the dumbed down American public, think that the psychopaths in our legislatures, can write words on paper and voila,  violate both the Constitution, in addition to our God given rights. Sorry to burst your bubble but that is not how this Constitutional Republic was set up. Doing this is criminal, and ignores both the Constitution and natural law.

So tell me from a rights violation standpoint how is calling for the violent tramping of a fundamental right,  and disarming Americans, any different than say calling for all Muslims (or Jews) in this country to be rounded up into camps and their property seized? And/or that they be executed?    Hint:  There is not a lick of difference.  All of my examples are crimes because they advocate for the trampling of peoples rights!  The people that call for the crime of gun grabbing, or vote to enact bills that “legalize” this crime, need to be arrested and feel the full force of the law.   There is no ambiguity here, there is no wiggle room. People that advocate taking your means of self defense are the lowest form of criminal scum, and need to be treated as such. (Even if they are  just “useful idiots” serving the Satanic, New World Order’s, United Nations led, disarmament agenda 1, 2, 3 )

The American people are fatally  dumbed down by the psychopaths in government violating yet  another right (your right to choose how to educate your children)  by mandating that your children attend 12 year government indoctrination camps so that they “think correctly”.

Hosea 4:6 King James Version (KJV)
6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

In case you are not aware one of the many laws that gun grabbers could be charged with, is United States Code, Title 18, sections 241 & 242.  i.e. “DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW”  (FWIW this same law could be used against anyone in government, including police, judges, and jailers) that have participated in the United Nations instigated war on drugs. It most certainly needs to be applied to the “legislators” that are calling for killing you if necessary to take your means of self defense.

Justice Department info on USC title 18 sections 241 & 242
FBI on USC tile 18 sections 241 & 242

Please post you comments in the comment section below….
I hope you realize that ALL gun laws are gun grabbing laws and are criminal violations of the 2nd amendment under USC 18 sections 241 & 242.  Let that sink in for awhile.

~MFP


New Bill to Require Gov’t Review of Social Media Accounts, Search Engine History to Buy a Gun

In one of the most Orwellian bills to date, lawmakers in New York have drafted and proposed a bill that will require a review of a citizens social media as well as their search engine history, going back years—just to buy a gun.

Senate Bill 9191 would establish an official investigation officer who would scour the social media posts and search engine history of anyone attempting to purchase a gun. It also applies to current gun owners who want to renew their licenses….. Read More

Yes, You Have the Right to Talk Back to the Government, But It Could Get You Killed [SHORT]

Long Version here

John Whitehead’s Commentary

November 27, 2018

The freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.”— Justice William J. Brennan, City of Houston v. Hill

What the architects of the police state want are submissive, compliant, cooperative, obedient, meek citizens who don’t talk back, don’t challenge government authority, don’t speak out against government misconduct, and don’t step out of line.

What the First Amendment protects—and a healthy constitutional republic requires—are citizens who routinely exercise their right to speak truth to power.

It’s not an easy undertaking.

Weaponized by police, prosecutors, courts and legislatures, “disorderly conduct” charges have become a convenient means by which to punish those individuals who refuse to be muzzled.

Cases like these have become all too common, typical of the bipolar nature of life in the American police state today: you may have distinct, protected rights on paper, but dare to exercise those rights and you put yourself at risk for fines, arrests, injuries and even death.

This is the unfortunate price of freedom.

Yet these are not new developments.

We have been circling this particular drain hole for some time now.

Almost 50 years ago, Lewis Colten was arrested outside Lexington, Kentucky, for questioning police and offering advice to his friend during a traffic stop.

Colten subsequently challenged his arrest as a violation of his First Amendment right to free speech and took the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sided with the police.

Although the Court acknowledged that Colten was not trespassing or disobeying any traffic regulation himself, the majority affirmed that Colten “had no constitutional right to observe the issuance of a traffic ticket or to engage the issuing officer in conversation at that time.”

The Supreme Court’s bottom line: protecting police from inconvenience, annoyance or alarm is more important than protecting speech that, in the government’s estimation, has “no social value.”

While the ruling itself was unsurprising for a judiciary that tends to march in lockstep with the police, the dissent by Justice William O. Douglas is a powerful reminder that the government exists to serve the people and not the other way around.

Stressing that Colten’s speech was quiet, not boisterous, devoid of “fighting words,” and involved no overt acts, fisticuffs, or disorderly conduct in the normal meaning of the words, Douglas took issue with the idea that merely by speaking to a government representative, in this case the police—a right enshrined in the First Amendment, by the way—Colten was perceived as inconveniencing and annoying the police.

In a passionate defense of free speech, Douglas declared:

Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent us?The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents. We who have the final word can speak softly or angrily. We can seek to challenge and annoy, as we need not stay docile and quiet. The situation might have indicated that Colten’s techniques were ill-suited to the mission he was on, that diplomacy would have been more effective. But at the constitutional level speech need not be a sedative; it can be disruptive.

It’s a power-packed paragraph full of important truths that the powers-that-be would prefer we quickly forget: We the people are the sovereigns. We have the final word. We can speak softly or angrily. We can seek to challenge and annoy. We need not stay docile and quiet. Our speech can be disruptive. It can invite dispute. It can be provocative and challenging. We do not have to bow submissively to authority or speak with reverence to government officials.

Now in theory, “we the people” have a constitutional right to talk back to the government.

In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded as much in City of Houston v. Hillwhen it struck down a city ordinance prohibiting verbal abuse of police officers as unconstitutionally overbroad and a criminalization of protected speech.

In practice, however, talking back—especially when the police are involved—can get you killed.

The danger is real.

We live in an age in which “we the people” are at the mercy of militarized, weaponized, immunized cops who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.”

While violent crime in America remains at an all-time low, the death toll as a result of police-sponsored violence continues to rise. In fact, more than 1,000 people are killed every year by police in America, more than any other country in the world.

What we are dealing with is a nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out against individuals posing little or no real threat.

Police encounters have deteriorated so far that anything short of compliance—including behavior the police perceive as disrespectful or “insufficiently deferential to their authority,” “threatening” or resistant—could get you arrested, jailed or killed.

The problem, of course, is that compliance is rarely enough to guarantee one’s safety.

When police officers are allowed to operate under the assumption that their word is law and that there is no room for any form of disagreement or even question, that serves to destroy the First Amendment’s assurances of free speech, free assembly and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, if ever there were a time to scale back on the mindset adopted by cops that they are the law and should be revered, feared and obeyed, it is now.

WC: 1063

Continue reading “Yes, You Have the Right to Talk Back to the Government, But It Could Get You Killed [SHORT]”

Murderers, Rapists, and Terrorists have More Rights to Due Process of the Law than Parents Accused of Child Abuse


MFP Commentary:
What”s the problem?   From my observations this criminal system is supported by about 100% of  “Christianity”.  After all Romans 13 says  that our evil  governments are put there by God!  (Sarcasm in case you missed it)    

It is my thesis, that all of the government evil that you see in this world is caused by Christians sitting on their asses and refusing to  act:

“In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousand fold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.” — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn – The Gulag Archipelago

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” (Edmund Burke)

“Noncooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with good.” – Gandhi

“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” —Dietrich Bonhoeffer

As always I must ask: Where the hell are the “pro-life” useful idiots?

~MFP

 


Commentary by Terri LaPoint
Health Impact News

It is clear that the effort to protect children from abuse has resulted in many non-abused children being taken away from innocent parents by Child Protective Services. Less than 16% of children are taken from their families for allegations of any kind of abuse (Source), and only 17% of allegations against parents are even substantiated (Source).

In the name of protecting some children, many more children are traumatized and abused by the very system tasked with protecting them. Medical kidnapping and state-sanctioned seizure of children is more common than most people have realized.

Yet parents whose children are taken find that they have less rights than criminals. The right to due process is conspicuously absent from almost all CPS cases. A legislator once told me that she does not care about the Constitutional rights of parents when it comes to child abuse allegations.

Is it possible to protect abused children while, at the same time, protect the integrity of families and the Constitutional or civil rights of parents?…. Read More

Taxpayers to Be Held Liable As Video Shows Police Beat a Woman for Selling Flowers With No Permit

Perris, CA — In the Land of the Free, if you do not pay the State before you attempt to sell a product or service to a willing customer, you can and will be extorted, kidnapped and caged, with extreme prejudice. A video published to Facebook backs up this notion, showing a Riverside County Sheriff’s Department deputy assault a woman who was selling flowers on the side of the road — because she apparently failed to pay the State for the privilege. Now, because the deputy’s actions were so egregious, the taxpayers are going to be held liable.

The victim, Joaquina Valencia, was selling flowers outside of a high school graduation ceremony in Perris last year when the altercation began. Because she was treated like a dog and savagely attacked, Valencia announced a lawsuit this week against the department.

Valencia says in the lawsuit that no human should ever be treated the way she was. “He tossed me like a rag,” Valencia said in an interview with NBC Los Angeles.

The complaint alleges Valencia was “unjustifiably beaten, shoved to the ground and arrested.”

The video does not tell the entire story. However, it starts as the officer is grabbing a woman who is holding multiple sets of flowers, clearly arranged for sale on the roadside.

As the video begins, the motorcycle officer is grabbing the woman by the arm. The woman, who apparently doesn’t speak English, is clearly terrified.

Not wanting to be assaulted or otherwise extorted by the deputy for selling flowers, the woman pulled her arm back and tried to move away. She was still holding onto her flowers, indicating that she was in no way a threat to the officer.

However, as the woman attempted to move backward, away from the officer, he grabbed her by her hair and attacked her….. Read More

Taxpayers to Be Held Liable As Video Shows Police Beat a Woman for Selling Flowers With No Permit

Chilling Report Shows 88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care


MFP Commentary:
I have been telling people this for years and feel like Noah, as none of them care to listen to the truth.

These are the kids that the ball dropping, useful idiots, known as  right to lifers, have “saved”.  Truth is most are sent to foster care and IMHO subjected to a fate far worse than simply being killed…..

This is the very same CPS that  many Christians seem to love, because it’s “for the children” and it’s where many of them get their kidnapped, denied any due process,  adopted children.   Many, if not most Christians, seem to be incapable of critical thought these days…. or any thinking at all really.  It’s time to wake up if you are in this uninformed supermajority.
~MFP


Chilling Report Shows 88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care

America has a dark secret that no one wants to admit. Talk of this secret will get you labelled as a conspiracy theorist, fake news, and outlets who report on it will have their organic reach throttled by social media and Google alike. Despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many in the mainstream media and the government refuse to see this very real epidemic of child sex trafficking in the United States. What’s more, according to the government’s own data, the vast majority of a portion of these trafficked kids are coming from the country’s own foster care system.

Children are being needlessly ripped from homes at such an alarming rate that hundreds of parents in one state have gone so far as to create a counter-kidnapping organization to stop it.

Continue reading “Chilling Report Shows 88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care”

Has the U.S. Become a Medical Police State? How Doctors Deny Due Process to Kidnap Children Through CPS


MFP Commentary:

This alleged power of Doctors to bypass due process is yet another example of Christians in our society accepting and supporting the Satanic concept of “Moral Relativism“.  People are so dumbed down I think that I am living the movie “Idiocracy

“Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of the Republic should make a Special privilege for medical freedoms as well as religious freedom.” ~Dr. Benjamin Rush

~MFP



By Health Impact News/Medicalkidnap.com Staff
Health Impact News 

The story is one that we hear repeatedly: parents take their child to the doctor for an accidental injury or an illness and end up being accused by a doctor of abusing their child.

The doctor calls Child Protective Services, and the stunned parents watch their child be taken away by social workers. Often, one of the parents will go to jail for accusations of child abuse.

There is little to no due process, and the multiple court hearings that follow are merely an illusion of attempts at justice, since the accusing doctor, a Child Abuse Pediatrician, has essentially become judge and jury.

Opposing viewpoints by other doctors are often ridiculed or disregarded.

It matters little if the parents have no history of violence, or that there is not a single shred of real forensic evidence which supports the diagnosis of abuse.

Once the Child Abuse Pediatrician decrees that child abuse has happened, the Child Protective System, as well as the foster care and adoption system, becomes activated, and parents watch in horror as their children are stripped away from them, sometimes permanently.

Continue reading “Has the U.S. Become a Medical Police State? How Doctors Deny Due Process to Kidnap Children Through CPS”

Red Flag Gun Laws: Yet Another Government Weapon for Compliance and Control [SHORT]

Long version here

 

 

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”—George Santayana

We never learn.

In the right (or wrong) hands, benevolent plans can easily be put to malevolent purposes.

Even the most well-intentioned government law or program can be—and has been—perverted, corrupted and used to advance illegitimate purposes once profit and power are added to the equation.

The war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on illegal immigration, asset forfeiture schemes, road safety schemes, school safety schemes, eminent domain: all of these programs started out as legitimate responses to pressing concerns and have since become weapons of compliance and control in the police state’s hands.

Mark my words: red flag gun laws, which allow the police to remove guns from people suspected of being threats, will only add to the government’s power.

These laws, growing in popularity as a legislative means by which to seize guns from individuals viewed as a danger to themselves or others, are yet another Trojan Horse, a stealth maneuver by the police state to gain greater power over an unsuspecting and largely gullible populace.

Thirteen states now have red flag laws on their books. That number is growing.

As The Washington Post reports, these laws “allow a family member, roommate, beau, law enforcement officer or any type of medical professional to file a petition [with a court] asking that a person’s home be temporarily cleared of firearms. It doesn’t require a mental-health diagnosis or an arrest.”…..Read More

Texas Judge Sanctions CPS $127K for Wrongfully Taking Couple’s Children and Lying to the Court


MFP Commentary:

When you can “take” children with no due process,  using lies as the basis for “taking” the children,  what is the difference between this, and kidnapping?   Where the hell are the criminal charges against the CPS workers?   I guess wearing a government uniform of any color exempts one from being prosecuted for any crime.  This is a glaring example of “Moral Relativism”  a plank in the beliefs of the church of Satan., and an evil  principle that is central to the structure of the US government and it’s agencies.    One last thought:  Where the hell are the “pro-life” “useful idiots”  (1) ?

~MFP



Commentary by Terri LaPoint
Health Impact News

There are elements that are common almost to the point of being universal in cases involving children taken from their families by Child Protective Services, including false allegations, lying by social workers, falsified medical records, failure of social workers to follow their own policies, laws broken by CPS, and the failure to consider evidence that refutes CPS allegations.

However, there is one thing that remains rare in CPS cases – that is, for anyone within the system to be held accountable. Repercussions for social workers, the CPS agency, or doctors involved in taking children from innocent parents are very rare….Read More