Babies for Cash – How the State Abuses Infants by Destroying the Mother-Child Bond in CPS Abductions

by Terri LaPoint
Health Impact News

A baby’s first year is crucial to a baby’s emotional and cognitive development. It is in the earliest months of life that the foundations for basic trust, security, and relationships are laid. The parent-child relationship is the environment in which that is designed to happen.

Yet the majority of children who enter foster care are taken within their first year of life, depriving them of critical bonding time and causing permanent trauma and damage to the babies’ ability to trust. More children in this age group are not returned home and are later adopted out than any other age group.

Human babies are born with an innate emotional and psychological need for their biological parents. When the child cannot or does not receive the love and acceptance of their own mother and father, he or she is left with a gaping hole deep inside that they may struggle the rest of their lives to fill even if they are loved, wanted, and cherished by a substitute parent.

The rationale behind the existence of Child Protective Services is that the state works for “the best interest of the child,” removing children from homes that the state decides are not good for the child.

Social workers and judges alike argue that they would rather be “on the safe side” and “err on the side of the child” by removing children to prevent the chance of them being harmed by their family. Countless social worker court reports of families whose stories we have covered contain references to the “possibility of future harm” without any evidence of actual harm having taken place…. Read More

Photos from a few of the stories Health Impact News has reported where infants were medically kidnapped by the state and put into foster care against the wishes of the parents.

 

Vigilantes with a Badge: Warrior Cops Endanger Our Lives and Freedoms

“There are always risks in challenging excessive police power, but the risks of not challenging it are more dangerous, even fatal.”—Hunter S. Thompson, Kingdom of Fear: Loathsome Secrets of a Star-Crossed Child in the Final Days of the American Century

I have known a lot of good cops, I have defended a lot of good cops, and I have been fortunate to call a number of good cops friends.

So when I say that warrior cops—hyped up on their own authority and the power of the badge—have not made America any safer or freer, I am not disrespecting any of the fine, decent, lawful police officers who take seriously their oath of office to serve and protect their fellow citizens, uphold the Constitution, and maintain the peace.

My beef is with the growing squads of warrior cops who have been given the green light to kill, shoot, taser, abuse and steal from American citizens in the so-called name of law and order.

These cops are little more than vigilantes with a badge.

Indeed, it is increasingly evident that militarized police armed with weapons of war who are allowed to operate above the law and break the laws with impunity have not made America any safer or freer.

Don’t take my word for it.

A new study by a political scientist at Princeton University concludes that militarizing police and SWAT teams “provide no detectable benefits in terms of officer safety or violent crime reduction.”

In fact, according to researcher Jonathan Mummolo, if police in America are feeling less safe, it’s because the process of transforming them into extensions of the military makes them less safe, less popular and less trust-worthy…..Read More

Ron Paul: Liberty Defined

08/20/2018  Ron Paul

Liberty means to exercise human rights in any manner a person chooses so long as it does not interfere with the exercise of the rights of others. This means, above all else, keeping government out of our lives. Only this path leads to the unleashing of human energies that build civilization, provide security, generate wealth, and protect the people from systematic rights violations. In this sense, only liberty can truly ward off tyranny, the great and eternal foe of mankind.

The definition of liberty I use is the same one that was accepted by Thomas Jefferson and his generation. It is the understanding derived from the great freedom tradition, for Jefferson himself took his understanding from John Locke (1632–1704). I use the term “liberal” without irony or contempt, for the liberal tradition in the true sense, dating from the late Middle Ages until the early part of the twentieth century, was devoted to freeing society from the shackles of the state. This is an agenda I embrace, and one that I believe all should embrace.

To believe in liberty is not to believe in any particular social and economic outcome. It is to trust in the spontaneous order that emerges when the state does not intervene in human volition and human cooperation. It permits people to work out their problems for themselves, build lives for themselves, take risks and accept responsibility for the results, and make their own decisions.

Our standards of living are made possible by the blessed institution of liberty. When liberty is under attack, everything we hold dear is under attack. Governments, by their very nature, notoriously compete with liberty, even when the stated purpose for establishing a particular government is to protect liberty.

Take the United States, for example. Our country was established with the greatest ideals and respect for individual freedom ever known. Yet look at where we are today: runaway spending and uncontrollable debt; a monstrous bureaucracy regulating our every move; total disregard for private property, free markets, sound money, and personal privacy; and a foreign policy of military expansionism. The restraints placed on our government in the Constitution by the Founders did not work. Powerful special interests rule, and there seems to be no way to fight against them. While the middle class is being destroyed, the poor suffer, the justly rich are being looted, and the unjustly rich are getting richer. The wealth of the country has fallen into the hands of a few at the expense of the many. Some say this is because of a lack of regulations on Wall Street, but that is not right. The root of this issue reaches far deeper than that.

Continue reading “Ron Paul: Liberty Defined”

The criminals at Facebook just censored 3 posts and locked my account!


MFP Commentary:

I am sure you are aware of the Nazi, book burning like censorship going on at facebook.
Just now they censored 3 articles in a row that I posted. Logged me out, and locked my account!!!

What are they so afraid of?  Perhaps the truth, because before the Internet they did a pretty good job of hiding it from us.

Look at the articles below and see if you think that they somehow broke the nebulous , undefined,  “community standards”.

I would really like to see criminal prosecutions of  the heads of Facebook, Amazon, and Google, for starters…

~MFP

Here are some screen shots:

 

Just the beginning of the harassment from FB

 

 

 

 

 

The harassment continues all designed to quell free speech
 

Freaking (real) nazi pukes. I want to see jail sentences.

 

Facebook is violating USC title 18 sections 241 & 242, when it censors our free speech to push the left’s communist political agenda. I would like to see jail sentences, as they as a public commons are clearly violating:

USC title 18 sections 241 & 242:


Of course they do not enforce this law, because if they did 90 percent plus of congress could be put in jail for passing laws that clearly violate our rights! ( I have never seen anyone suggest that we apply it to the psychopaths known as congress, but it does apply to them)

 

The 3 articles that FaceBook does not want posted or you to see:

Facebook secretly tracking “trust ratings” for users with “social score” algorithm right out of communist China

Netflix Backs Down to Conservatives

 

Disgusting Democrats cling to open borders agenda even as American citizens like Mollie Tibbetts are butchered by illegal aliens

Battlefield America: The Ongoing War on the American People

A government which will turn its tanks upon its people, for any reason, is a government with a taste of blood and a thirst for power and must either be smartly rebuked, or blindly obeyed in deadly fear.”—John Salter

Police in a small Georgia town tasered a 5-foot-2, 87-year-old woman who was using a kitchen knife to cut dandelions for use in a recipe. Police claim they had no choice but to taser the old woman, who does not speak English but was smiling at police to indicate she was friendly, because she failed to comply with orders to put down the knife.

Police in California are being sued for using excessive force against a deaf 76-year-old woman who was allegedly jaywalking and failed to halt when police yelled at her. According to the lawsuit, police searched the woman and her grocery bags. She was then slammed to the ground, had a foot or knee placed behind her neck or back, handcuffed, arrested and cited for jaywalking and resisting arrest….. Read More

BLOG: Missouri Firearms Coalition


MFP Commentary:

 

Become a Member  Here

About Missouri Firearms Coalition 

Let me play devil’s advocate, for a minute, by pointing out my concerns about  the statement:    “law abiding gun owners” made on the above “about” page:  (FWIW  every gun group , and owner, almost without exception,   accepts this  anti liberty “group-think” slogan , so I am not picking on MGC in particular.)

This is the text that I have a concern with:
1.) “While professed pro-gun legislators have a majority in both chambers, Missouri lags behind many other states in protecting the rights of law abiding gun owners.”

Why do  people that claim to be educated in the concept of liberty, assert that if someone is not “law abiding”  (such as maybe being a christian in some countries)  that somehow your right to self defense disappears?   Do any of these people think before they type?     Doesn’t this imply that law breaking  gun owners have no rights? (It’s foundational in Western law that everyone has rights, all of the time.  Even “lawbreakers”)

If these group thinkers carry their logic forward  they would also use terms like “law abiding parents”, where they believe that if a parent breaks a law, that they would forever lose their right to be a parent or to conceive children.  Aren’t they saying the exact same  nutty thing about gun owners?   I guess a law breaking food shopper would perhaps be banned by law for life from entering a grocery stores.  Think outside of your normalcy bias and group think and you will clearly see how nutty all of these assertions are to anyone that believes in inalienable rights.

groupthink
a pattern of thought characterized by self-deception, forced manufacture of consent, and conformity to group values and ethics

Let’s continue, if  a gun owner is not law abiding, to the extent that he is incarcerated, his weapons, are kept from him, by the fact that he can’t bring them into the prison.   However the day this person gets out, even if a convicted 1st degree murder, he get’s access to his guns back that very same day.   At  least  that is the way this country worked, and was supposed to work, until the US Congress, instituted the Nazi gun Control Act in the US and renamed it the “1968 Gun Control Act”.    Americans up to that point understood that the right can ever be taken away (or regulated for  that matter) as that is the very definition of a right.  Close to 100 years of government monopoly schooling has produced individuals that have no clue as to what their rights are, or the proper function of government, according to the founders and our founding documents. That is how over the top, disgusting slave-speak like:  “law abiding gun owners” get into the lexicon.  Isn’t this an oxymoron of the highest level?  What does following the law have to do with a right, since a legitimate law can not take a right away)

 

2.) “In 2015 year alone, numerous states signed Constitutional Carry into law and made progress in advancing Stand-Your-Ground law – yet both of these bills died again this year in Jefferson City.”

“Laws” do not give us our rights.   The second amendment recognizes the fact that we had and still have a pre existing right of self defense.  We need no “laws” to tell us this.  Further “Laws” can do nothing but restrict this right. People that speak and act like this,  are again very clearly illustrating that they do not even understand the basic concept of a right. This is scary, when the more educated of us, are still missing the philosophical  elephants in the room.

The solution IMHO, the only real one that will get us off of the hamster wheel of trying to enact legislation is to educate the public as to what their rights are.   Passing legislation is nothing more than licking your masters boot, for a few permissions, as government can not grant rights.

Think about it, and I welcome your comments below.

Lastly please  contact this group with your thoughts, and if their answers convince you that they are philosophically on firm ground, then buy a membership, and support them.

While I despise the machiavellian compromises, that they are making, perhaps it is necessary, but that does not mean that we should not have a less myopic, longer term goal and methodology planned out.(Like educating the public about their rights perhaps)

I plan on purchasing a membership, even if we may have a difference of opinion.  These are not the times for a house divided.  Not at all, and after all they are keeping the wolf from the door for the time being, as expedient as the method may be.

In Liberty!
~MFP

BLOG: Thoughts on Essential Oil Companies and Products

MFP Commentary:

I am not a new comer to the nutrition scene, though I held off my exploration of “essential oils” for years now.   I was put off by the sleazy marketing aimed at people with disposable incomes that knew little or nothing about nutrition. Your typical American soccer mom, that demanded the AMA model of a simple solution, of a  pill (or oil)  for every ill.      I saw, and still see most of these essential oil groupies, as being very uneducated about health and nutrition.   Why else would you see people ignoring the foundations of health (nutrition/toxins, sleep, exercise, emotions) and try to build a house of health on a structure with no foundation?   It makes no sense at all to those that understand that the body needs at least 90 raw materials (essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, minerals, & vitamins) to build a healthy body.   Many of these people must believe in magic,  that somehow that these magical oils are going to provide their bodies with all of the essential 90 nutrients that the body needs.  And from looking at most of these people you can tell that they are not getting good nutrition, just from their body shapes and the condition of their skin. Watching what they eat is even more telling of their nutritional ignorance.

Now don’t get me wrong, I am not against essential oils.   I am very much in favor of, using them, when called for and appropriate.  IMHO that  is when you have built a foundation for health by addressing diet/toxins. sleep, exercise, and emotional health and you still get some ailment. Then and only then is the modality of of exploring other options advisable. Especially from a financial perspective.  The very first thing that someone considering taking an oil should consider is: Where did I screw up on the diet/toxin side of the house?  And try and address the root cause rather than using Essential oils as band aides for your negligent treatment of your body.

All of these preconceptions were  proven out, when I somehow sat through a 3 hour Young Living seminar, that  can be best described as an indoctrination fest.  Three solid hours of being in an “echo chamber” of ideas.  I don’t have the time nor inclination to go into details here, and will move on…..

After this Young Living boot camp, I decided to go to the Young Living web site and see about getting a bottle of Bergamot oil.  After all their reputation as far as I knew was stellar.   I was  immediately confused that they were saying to use this oil only externally, when one of the most potent uses of Bergamot oil is internally for inducing autophagy.

To me this is a  lie by omission.  They had to be aware, or should have been,  aware of this use for the Bergamot,  but are   are telling people that internal use is not safe!   Reading between the lines, it seems like this Christian company’s god is the USDA, as they seem to fear repercussions from them, more than they think about telling the truth, and having their customers health as their first concern, by exercising their God given right of free speech.  Sorry but Kowtowing to government agencies illegitimate powers, by curtailing your God given free speech is not something that Christians should be doing IMHO.  If the manufacturer of a product will not educate it’s customers about the uses of a health product, then who will? And who is responsible when sickness results from this omission?

Trying to order a single item as a retail customer was a nightmare.   The $28 bottle of Bergamot expanded to cost $45 if ordered as a mere mortal.   So, I reluctantly explored becoming an associate.  After an hour of going in circles,   and being treated like  mushroom (being kept in the dark and fed bull shit) I had to give up. This entire MLM (multi level marketing) scheme was purposely obfuscated, for some reason, and I was not going to be the mark, whose time was going to be wasted.

Consequently I spent a few hours doing more research.  What I discovered was that the obvious way

Explain  why I wanted to GC-MS data sheet.
ducking question

 

 


Hello, XXX,
Thank you for contacting the Young Living® email department in regards to  our Bergamot oil. Our scientific testing is an important part of our Seed to Seal® quality commitment. We believe that extensive testing is necessary to produce quality essential oils, and one or two tests is not sufficient. We have spent years developing some of the most sophisticated and accurate test methods in the industry. Sharing these specific methods could put us at a competitive disadvantage. Additionally, this information is complex and only an experienced scientist who is familiar with natural products will understand the reports and information.

Thank you for taking the time to contact Young Living®. I hope that you have a wonderful day XXX.
If you have additional questions or concerns, or if we can assist you in any way, please feel free to contact us via telephone at 1-800-371-3515, via fax at 866-203-5666, via e-mail at custserv@youngliving.com, or via our Live Help feature at www.youngliving.com.
Sincerely,
XXX
Member Services
Young Living® Essential Oils
3125 W Executive Parkway
Lehi, UT  84043
USA
www.youngliving.com

 


explain why they are hiding this info

~MFP

 

Hundreds of NC teachers are flunking math exams. It may not be their fault.


MFP Commentary:
If it’s not “their fault” then I wonder who the hell is at fault? Could it be that teaching majors are filled to the brim with the dumbest, by far, students on campus?  Could it be that they got a very poor education because they  themselves attended government schools filled with low IQ teachers?
I know of which I speak. I have taken several  education courses that are required by people in that major and I was flabbergasted each time by the apparent low IQ of the people taking the course.    Government needs to get the hell out of the way and let the free market, dictate who is going to teach.  What a conflict of interest to have the state make that choice. Not to mention that the state has implemented both the first and tenth planks of the communist manifesto to create our schools. 

Can you imagine a country of citizens, educated in the free market by teachers that are gifted, and intelligent, rather than the low IQ crowd  that helps the government indoctrinate your children with all sorts of falsehoods and lies?  The founders told us that we would only be free if we had an educated electorate.  Do you think that these government schools that are designed to dumb us down are a big part of us losing our freedoms?
~MFP

Book:  The Deliberate  Dumbing down of America

Video: Charlotte Iserbyt – Deliberate Dumbing Down of the World

Video: History… Connected: The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America w/ Charlotte Iserbyt

If  you doubt this dumbing down, I challenge you to take this 8th grade graduation exam from 1895 Kansas:

An 1895 8th Grade Final Exam: I Couldn’t Pass It. Could You?

and here.


According to a report, almost 2,400 North Carolina elementary school teachers have failed the math portion of their licensing exams, which puts their careers in jeopardy. News & Observer file photo

BLOG: Report on the 14th day of my water fast


MFP commentary:
Really surprised that I am considering not breaking this fast as 14 days was my, what I thought  at the time, a rather unrealistic, goal. I  just decided not to thaw, and cook the roast beef brisket, to put up in the freezer because the smell of food like that for hours and hours would likely set off cravings.
The mental clarity that I have is phenomenal. My moods are extremely upbeat, and positive.  I have not really experienced “hunger” yet. This is quit unlike the untruths that we are told about fasting. The prevalence of it in scripture should make you inquisitive as to what “fasting” is really all about.

The only downside is the lack of energy, but I think that is temporary. Our bodies are very insulin resistant because of years of overdosing on carbohydrates, and it takes a few fasts to get the body to repair the damage and start working correctly by burning fat efficiently.

 

There is a recurring thought in my head. That is the comparison of what could be thought of as the “inconvenience” of fasting, compared to the downright living-hell of going through chemo. As few  as two,  5 day fasts a year dramatically cut one’s cancer risks across the board. But teaching people to fast does not make your doctor or big pharma any money, so you see where that goes….. They would rather have you undergo chemo than fasting. It sounds like a criminal enterprise to me. Perhaps proof that the AMA medical monopoly is really a thinly veiled eugenics movement, at least on the chronic care side of the house.

 

I usually do not not post pictures of myself on the web, much less a selfie of me with my shirt off. But I Just had to make the point of how diet, nutritional supplementation, and life style can make unbelievable changes in your health. If you knew me 5 years ago you would not think that this is the same person.

 

Break out of the Matrix. Take the red pill. Gain control of your health. It’s really as easy as just deciding that is what you are going to do.
Visit the health  section of this website HERE.
Comments?

Continue reading “BLOG: Report on the 14th day of my water fast”

When does “professional identity” become a mental illness?

 
I am serious folks:
I have been physically attacked merly for making ernest observations, about the professions of police officer,  and soldier.
 
I have not  been physically attacked (yet)  for my observations on the profession of doctor, but have  experienced reactions just as inappropriate.
 
It has escaped the public’s observation  that all 3 of these professions are government created monopolies, that would very likely not exist, at least in the same form, in a free society that embraced the free market. Something that we clearly do not do.
 
To go a bit further down this rabbit hole have you observed these other government created monopolies?
 
1.) Education (i.e. government schools) “home schooling” is just a permission, and must follow the states monopoly guidelines.  We get the same “group think”  mentality from educators that we get from these other groups.  This group think makes them similar to the “Borg”  in the Star Trek series.  
 
2.) Attorneys: We are free to any legal defense that we want as long as they are government sanctioned attorneys. Never mind that I have never once been able to afford their monopoly prices, nor the fact that this urinates all over our right to contract….  You might want to investigate Lysander Spooner
 
3.) Our food supply. Once again you are free to eat anything that you want, and sell any food you want….. as long as it’s government approved. Have you ever tried to purchase non-ultra pasteurized heavy cream? Real cream, that is safe to eat  without denatured proteins in it?  It’s a MENSA test to local and sells at a price (because of government “regulation”) that people like myself simply can not afford.  Consumer group think here is that the government is “protecting” them.  While in fact our food choices and government food pyramid looks like a eugenics program to me, and this “protection”  is again urinating all over the individuals right to contract.  (something that all of these monopoly professions do)   This resource will be updated soon:   Food Freedom  Ministry
 
 
Individuals in all of these government created “professions”  often surrender any rational. individual thought to the group.   They like the other groups identify more as  the government defined   profession than as real, living, diverse, human beings.   It is IMHO a mental illness…. as they perceive any observations of their profession that they do not concur with, as an ad hominem attack upon their person, and often like the libtards at Antifa,  rationalize physically assaulting you because of the opinions that you hold.  If this is not a mental illness I do not know what is.
 

What are your thoughts on this topic?  Comment below if you want to flesh some of these thoughts out with me.

~MFP