MFP Commentary:
This is George Soros flavored “legalization”. i.e. raping the sheep for as much money as possible. This is not about safety and you can bet that those on big pharma drugs will get a pass.
~MFP
The Relationship Between Directed Energy Weapons and Your Smart Meter-Virginia Farver-CSS
MFP Commentary:
What you cannot hide is genocide. The Trilateral Commission just announced that 5G will be the backbone of “smart cities”. This should send a chill up your spine. The FCC is forcing 5G upon us. Virginia Farver joins Dave Hodges as she unveils newly discovered health effects of 5G.
Here is another MFP article on 5G:
A Closer Look at 5G Equipment that is Being Installed Across Los Angeles
~MFP
The Relationship Between Directed Energy Weapons and Your Smart Meter-Virginia Farver-CSS
MFP EDITORIAL “Should we be arresting the gun grabbers?” / New Bill to Require Gov’t Review of Social Media Accounts, Search Engine History to Buy a Gun
MFP Commentary:
“Should we be arresting the gun grabbers?”
It pains me that I even have to ask this question, but it’s obvious that Americans are so dumbed down that they don’t have a clue as to the the correct answer, or why.
Would you support the arrest of people preaching the idea that we should hang blacks and put Jews into FEMA camps? Or any other call for using violence, to violate the inalienable God given rights of anyone?
Well isn’t self defense a God given right? One that is explicitly protected from government intrusion by the 2nd amendment. Right in the US Constitution, the highest law of the land.
Yet most of the dumbed down American public, think that the psychopaths in our legislatures, can write words on paper and voila, violate both the Constitution, in addition to our God given rights. Sorry to burst your bubble but that is not how this Constitutional Republic was set up. Doing this is criminal, and ignores both the Constitution and natural law.
So tell me from a rights violation standpoint how is calling for the violent tramping of a fundamental right, and disarming Americans, any different than say calling for all Muslims (or Jews) in this country to be rounded up into camps and their property seized? And/or that they be executed? Hint: There is not a lick of difference. All of my examples are crimes because they advocate for the trampling of peoples rights! The people that call for the crime of gun grabbing, or vote to enact bills that “legalize” this crime, need to be arrested and feel the full force of the law. There is no ambiguity here, there is no wiggle room. People that advocate taking your means of self defense are the lowest form of criminal scum, and need to be treated as such. (Even if they are just “useful idiots” serving the Satanic, New World Order’s, United Nations led, disarmament agenda 1, 2, 3 )
The American people are fatally dumbed down by the psychopaths in government violating yet another right (your right to choose how to educate your children) by mandating that your children attend 12 year government indoctrination camps so that they “think correctly”.
Hosea 4:6 King James Version (KJV)
6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
In case you are not aware one of the many laws that gun grabbers could be charged with, is United States Code, Title 18, sections 241 & 242. i.e. “DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW” (FWIW this same law could be used against anyone in government, including police, judges, and jailers) that have participated in the United Nations instigated war on drugs. It most certainly needs to be applied to the “legislators” that are calling for killing you if necessary to take your means of self defense.
Please post you comments in the comment section below….
I hope you realize that ALL gun laws are gun grabbing laws and are criminal violations of the 2nd amendment under USC 18 sections 241 & 242. Let that sink in for awhile.
~MFP
New Bill to Require Gov’t Review of Social Media Accounts, Search Engine History to Buy a Gun
In one of the most Orwellian bills to date, lawmakers in New York have drafted and proposed a bill that will require a review of a citizens social media as well as their search engine history, going back years—just to buy a gun.
Senate Bill 9191 would establish an official investigation officer who would scour the social media posts and search engine history of anyone attempting to purchase a gun. It also applies to current gun owners who want to renew their licenses….. Read More
Chilling Report Shows 88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care
MFP Commentary:
I have been telling people this for years and feel like Noah, as none of them care to listen to the truth.
These are the kids that the ball dropping, useful idiots, known as right to lifers, have “saved”. Truth is most are sent to foster care and IMHO subjected to a fate far worse than simply being killed…..
This is the very same CPS that many Christians seem to love, because it’s “for the children” and it’s where many of them get their kidnapped, denied any due process, adopted children. Many, if not most Christians, seem to be incapable of critical thought these days…. or any thinking at all really. It’s time to wake up if you are in this uninformed supermajority.
~MFP
Chilling Report Shows 88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care
America has a dark secret that no one wants to admit. Talk of this secret will get you labelled as a conspiracy theorist, fake news, and outlets who report on it will have their organic reach throttled by social media and Google alike. Despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many in the mainstream media and the government refuse to see this very real epidemic of child sex trafficking in the United States. What’s more, according to the government’s own data, the vast majority of a portion of these trafficked kids are coming from the country’s own foster care system.
Children are being needlessly ripped from homes at such an alarming rate that hundreds of parents in one state have gone so far as to create a counter-kidnapping organization to stop it.
Continue reading “Chilling Report Shows 88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care”
Webster County Missouri, Faith Based Food Club being put together…..
Food freedom/sovereignty is sweeping the country. It started in Italy, has infected Maine, parts of Tennessee, soon Indiana it looks like, and now Webster County Missouri.
Go check it out!
BLOG: What’s wrong with this picture?
MFP Commentary:
Do you see what’s alarmingly wrong with this picture of the Seymour town hall building?
I venture to guess that those that have limited their philosophical knowledge of government to the propaganda taught in the government schools 1 2 3 (indoctrination centers) , have no idea what I am talking about.
Disqus comments are below:
~MFP
BLOG: Is Sunday the Sabbath?
MFP Commentary:
Not even remotely defensible.
The Roman emperor Constantine picked Sunday because it was the pagan god day of worship that the Roman citizens were used to. Nothing at all in scripture about Sunday. No “Christian” that I have ever asked has ever been able to show me where the sabbath was changed in scripture….
“Christian ” has become synonymous IMHO with dumbed down non thinking people…..
Not even sure Saturday is the Sabbath as the 7 day week was not even invented when God gave the tablets to Moses.
Something to think about..eh?
~MFP
Why We Can’t Ignore the “Militia” Clause of the Second Amendment
MFP Commentary:
As a long standing member of the state sanctioned Missouri Militia, I find that just like the general public, militia members, as a rule do not understand the Constitution nor the principles that this country was founded upon. Ironically many are past members of the one organization that the militia is there to protect us from if necessary: A standing army as the founders called it. The US military. None seem to realize this. Most have a strange infatuation with the US military, and want to emulate it regardless of whether it makes any sense whatsoever for the militia to do so.
They sell the Militia to the public, and to it’s members as something that it primarily is not! They sell the milita as “Disaster Relief, State Defense & Community Service”. I have never heard anyone delve into what they mean by “state defense” because most don’t even know what it means, and those that might, don’t want to go there. We have a politically correct militia that IMHO is close to useless because they do not even know why they exist, nor understand our founding documents.
Most also do not recognize the other standing army that is in our midst, one that I think the founders would be very alarmed about. We now have a standing arm of soldiers that wear blue uniforms, and proudly proclaim that they are “order followers”. Just like their brothers at the Auschwitz concentration camp in Nazi Germany. They will, and brag about it, enforce any “law” that the psychopath in the legislature commit to paper.
We were never meant to have either standing army. A free people should not be lorded over by standing armies. As envisioned by the founders, you and I, the militia, are and were “the police”. And during times of peace we were the only military on the continent. (Spare the Navy which is authorized by the Constitution during times of peace)
Spoiler alert: This is the heart of the this article IMHO:
In his book Eagle and Sword: The Federalists and the Creation of the Military Establishment in America, 1783–1802, Richard Kohn writes:
“No principle of government was more widely understood or more completely accepted by the generation of Americans that established the United States than the danger of a standing army in peacetime. Because a standing army represented the ultimate in uncontrolled and controllable power, any nation that maintained permanent forces surely risked the overthrow of legitimate government and the introduction of tyranny and despotism.”
~MFP
While many defenders of private gun ownership recognize that the Second Amendment was written to provide some sort of counterbalance against the coercive power of the state, this argument is often left far too vague to reflect an accurate view of this historical context surrounding the Amendment.
After all, it is frequently pointed out that private ownership of shotguns and semi-automatic rifles could offer only very limited resistance to the extremely well-equipped and well-armed United States military.
It is often, therefore, just assumed that the writers of the Second Amendment were naïve and incapable of seeing the vast asymmetries that would develop between military weaponry and the sort of weaponry the average person was likely to use.
Was the plan really to just have unorganized amateurs grab their rifles and repel the invasion of a well-trained military force?1
The answer is no, and we know this by looking at the wording and reasoning behind the Second Amendment. The text, of course, reads “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Gun-rights advocates often fixate on the second half of the amendment, claiming that the phrase about a militia is just something that provides a reasoning for the second phrase. Many opponents of gun control even suggest that the only phrase here of key importance is “shall not be infringed.”
The Second Amendment as a Guard Against a Standing Army
Looking at the debates surrounding the Second Amendment and military power at the end of the eighteenth century, however, we find that the authors of the Second Amendment had a more sophisticated vision of gun ownership than is often assumed.
Continue reading “Why We Can’t Ignore the “Militia” Clause of the Second Amendment”
The criminals at Facebook just censored 3 posts and locked my account!
MFP Commentary:
I am sure you are aware of the Nazi, book burning like censorship going on at facebook.
Just now they censored 3 articles in a row that I posted. Logged me out, and locked my account!!!
What are they so afraid of? Perhaps the truth, because before the Internet they did a pretty good job of hiding it from us.
Look at the articles below and see if you think that they somehow broke the nebulous , undefined, “community standards”.
I would really like to see criminal prosecutions of the heads of Facebook, Amazon, and Google, for starters…
~MFP
Here are some screen shots:
Freaking (real) nazi pukes. I want to see jail sentences.
Facebook is violating USC title 18 sections 241 & 242, when it censors our free speech to push the left’s communist political agenda. I would like to see jail sentences, as they as a public commons are clearly violating:
USC title 18 sections 241 & 242:
Of course they do not enforce this law, because if they did 90 percent plus of congress could be put in jail for passing laws that clearly violate our rights! ( I have never seen anyone suggest that we apply it to the psychopaths known as congress, but it does apply to them)
The 3 articles that FaceBook does not want posted or you to see:
BLOG: Missouri Firearms Coalition
MFP Commentary:
About Missouri Firearms Coalition
Let me play devil’s advocate, for a minute, by pointing out my concerns about the statement: “law abiding gun owners” made on the above “about” page: (FWIW every gun group , and owner, almost without exception, accepts this anti liberty “group-think” slogan , so I am not picking on MGC in particular.)
This is the text that I have a concern with:
1.) “While professed pro-gun legislators have a majority in both chambers, Missouri lags behind many other states in protecting the rights of law abiding gun owners.”
Why do people that claim to be educated in the concept of liberty, assert that if someone is not “law abiding” (such as maybe being a christian in some countries) that somehow your right to self defense disappears? Do any of these people think before they type? Doesn’t this imply that law breaking gun owners have no rights? (It’s foundational in Western law that everyone has rights, all of the time. Even “lawbreakers”)
If these group thinkers carry their logic forward they would also use terms like “law abiding parents”, where they believe that if a parent breaks a law, that they would forever lose their right to be a parent or to conceive children. Aren’t they saying the exact same nutty thing about gun owners? I guess a law breaking food shopper would perhaps be banned by law for life from entering a grocery stores. Think outside of your normalcy bias and group think and you will clearly see how nutty all of these assertions are to anyone that believes in inalienable rights.
groupthink
: a pattern of thought characterized by self-deception, forced manufacture of consent, and conformity to group values and ethics
Let’s continue, if a gun owner is not law abiding, to the extent that he is incarcerated, his weapons, are kept from him, by the fact that he can’t bring them into the prison. However the day this person gets out, even if a convicted 1st degree murder, he get’s access to his guns back that very same day. At least that is the way this country worked, and was supposed to work, until the US Congress, instituted the Nazi gun Control Act in the US and renamed it the “1968 Gun Control Act”. Americans up to that point understood that the right can ever be taken away (or regulated for that matter) as that is the very definition of a right. Close to 100 years of government monopoly schooling has produced individuals that have no clue as to what their rights are, or the proper function of government, according to the founders and our founding documents. That is how over the top, disgusting slave-speak like: “law abiding gun owners” get into the lexicon. Isn’t this an oxymoron of the highest level? What does following the law have to do with a right, since a legitimate law can not take a right away)
2.) “In 2015 year alone, numerous states signed Constitutional Carry into law and made progress in advancing Stand-Your-Ground law – yet both of these bills died again this year in Jefferson City.”
“Laws” do not give us our rights. The second amendment recognizes the fact that we had and still have a pre existing right of self defense. We need no “laws” to tell us this. Further “Laws” can do nothing but restrict this right. People that speak and act like this, are again very clearly illustrating that they do not even understand the basic concept of a right. This is scary, when the more educated of us, are still missing the philosophical elephants in the room.
The solution IMHO, the only real one that will get us off of the hamster wheel of trying to enact legislation is to educate the public as to what their rights are. Passing legislation is nothing more than licking your masters boot, for a few permissions, as government can not grant rights.
Think about it, and I welcome your comments below.
Lastly please contact this group with your thoughts, and if their answers convince you that they are philosophically on firm ground, then buy a membership, and support them.
While I despise the machiavellian compromises, that they are making, perhaps it is necessary, but that does not mean that we should not have a less myopic, longer term goal and methodology planned out.(Like educating the public about their rights perhaps)
I plan on purchasing a membership, even if we may have a difference of opinion. These are not the times for a house divided. Not at all, and after all they are keeping the wolf from the door for the time being, as expedient as the method may be.
In Liberty!
~MFP